Does everyone find it as annoying as I do that the big photo sharing websites don't have good printing interfaces, say Photoshop quality, and seem to be relying on pushing cusomters to photo printing companies for business. As a user of these sites, it seems to me that a lot user-value could be added in a straightforward way.
But first some background:
Comparison of Traffic on Photo-Sharing Sites
APIs
http://code.google.com/apis/picasaweb/developers_guide_protocol.html seems clean
http://www.flickr.com/services/api/
http://www.snapfish.com/
http://www.kodakgallery.com/Welcome.jsp
http://www.shutterfly.com/
Photo Sharing and Printing
http://www.pcworld.com/printable/article/id,127882/printable.html
http://gallery.menalto.com/node/954
Potential Back End
http://www.enomalism.com/features/next-generation/
Interface to Mobile Phones with Cameras
http://peterwilliams97.blogspot.com/search?q=mobile+phones
Potential Plugins
Printing to computer printers (instead of print shops)
Image filters
Image analysis
Photo organization
Making people more attractive which could also impact crime rates .
http://machine-learning.blogspot.com/2008/07/google-translation-flickr-api.html
For that price he could’ve had 54 Jamaican beef patties or 1/216 of a
conference featuring Gray Davis, Grover Norquist, and a rabbi
-
It’s the eternal question . . . what do you want, if given these three
options: (a) 54 Jamaican beef patties (b) 1/216 of a conference featuring a
collecti...
2 days ago
No comments:
Post a Comment